Thursday, 3 November 2016

What are the Brexiters scared of?

No-one can have failed to notice that many Brexiters are getting nervous. You'd think that having "won" and being convinced that Brexit will be a rip-roaring success with no downside (as Brexit Minister David Davis said), they'd rise to the occasion and be able to defend their decision and answer any difficult questions with ease.

But instead they have fallen back on one simple rhetorical device, which is to accuse anyone (even those who supported Leave) of being "anti democratic" or "opposing the will of the British* people" if they dare ask any pertinent questions or heaven forbid express the view that they still think Brexit isn't a good idea or might result in some difficulties.

In a democracy, democratic decisions can and indeed must be subject to debate and disagreement, and must be able to be challenged through democratic means. Anyone saying otherwise is essentially promoting a dictatorship of the (in this case slim and some polls indicate diminishing) majority. Also, this is how the Brexiters got a second referendum on EU membership in the first place (they argued for a referendum, persuaded the Tories to make it their policy, and then enough of them voted for a Tory government).

After a general election no-one says that opposition parties have to stop opposing policies of the governing party because that's "the will of the majority of voters". Why should a referendum be different?

Also, any vote (general election or referendum) is a snapshot of people's views at that moment in time and views can change. If there'd been a referendum on the invasion of Iraq, a slim majority (if opinion polls of that time are accurate) would have voted in favour. At that time those who opposed the invasion e.g. the then LibDem leader Charles Kennedy, were attacked and vilified in particular by the right wing media and political opponents (sounds familiar?). Within a few years, public opinion changed dramatically and Charles Kennedy was sadly proven right (I say sadly because of the many horrific consequences of that war). 

The anti-democratic Brexiters appear to have such little faith in their own arguments that the only way they think they can prevent any change in public opinion is to stamp down on any legitimate questions or debate. I wonder what are they scared of?

The only way that Brexit can be stopped is through democratic means e.g. a general election, a referendum on the terms of any final deal etc, so if you oppose that, you oppose democracy when it doesn't align with your views. If the Brexiters truly believed in the brilliance of leaving the EU, then they wouldn't fear any democratic challenge at all, because they'd be confident it would fail and their arguments would triumph.

* of course a majority of the British people didn't vote for either side in the EU referendum as a sizeable minority chose not to vote (so we can't be sure what they think), some Brits were prevented from voting (including some of the estimated 2 million living in other EU countries), and up to 1 million foreign nationals (Irish and commonwealth citizens resident in the UK) were able to vote in the referendum (caveat: I don't know how many foreign nationals voted). 

Tuesday, 30 August 2016

The Liberal Democrats are selecting a candidate for Islington North and I'm shortlisted!

After being rather annoyed by the lacklustre efforts/sabotage (depending on what you believe...) of the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn in the recent EU referendum campaign, I decided to throw my hat in the ring to be the Liberal Democrat candidate for Islington North, Mr Corbyn's seat.

I have only ever been a parliamentary candidate in Yorkshire (I wasn't even on the London candidates list) and was usually intending to stand in Yorkshire again in the next General Election. I previously stood in Rotherham in 2010 and Morley and Outwood in 2015.

Morley might sound familar; it was Ed Balls' seat. Despite having no money bar my deposit being paid (I had to fundraise £800 for my election address), very few activists, and being almost unable to take time off my non political day job, I managed to poll over 1400 votes. Ed Balls lost by 422, so I would like to claim at least some credit : )

I happen to live in Islington North (since 2009 with a lengthy interlude in Leeds while being a Yorkshire MEP) and have been a reliable foot solider with the local party in many elections/by-elections.

I was actively involved in campaigning in the EU referendum both with Islington Liberal Democrats and my local Stronger In group (Islington North). Despite being asked numerous times to come along to local Stronger In campaigning activities, Mr Corbyn didn't manage to do this once. Not once. He did however manage to go on holiday during the campaign : (

I don't have anything personally against Mr Corbyn; I met him once at an anti pub-co sit-in (trying to stop a landlady being evicted by big pub company) and thought he was a nice man. I also understand from LibDem colleagues who have previously been councillors in Islington North that he is a good constituency MP who effectively assists those who need his help. 

However, his lack of effort on the EU referendum combined with his appalling lack of leadership skills, which means that her Majesty's official opposition is too busy fighting itself to effectively oppose the current Tory government, is enough to make me want to stand against him.

There are three candidates shortlisted to be the next LibDem parliamentary candidate for Islington North. The other two candidates are both long standing local LibDem activists. They are Julian Gregory who stood for the LibDems in Islington North in 2015, and Keith Angus who has twice been LibDem parliamentary candidate for the neighbouring Hackney North and Stoke Newington constituency.

Local party members are invited to attend a hustings next Monday 5 September to choose the candidate. Now I have just under a week to persuade them to choose me!

Wednesday, 22 June 2016

Why I am voting REMAIN

  1. Above all, the EU is a political endeavour to create peace through trade and it has WORKED! My grandparents* (sadly no longer with us), lived through world war two and some of its horrors. The EU is the Europe that came after that and said “never again”.

  2. Being a key player in Brussels increases Britain’s standing in the world. Our global allies like the USA and Commonwealth countries appreciate our voice being in the room, and our very British pragmatism and level-headedness is appreciated by many of our European partners.

    Despite the attempts of Leavers to do Britain down and paint us as a helpless victim of the rest of the EU, since 1999, the UK has been outvoted 2% of the time. So in fact we’re very good at getting British priorities accepted at EU level. We should be proud of this! Being outside the door when crucial decisions about our continent are being made would be a loss of control and influence for the UK.

  3. I believe in cooperation! In an interconnected world facing serious challenges, Britain can do much more by working together with our European neighbours to tackle the big issues like climate change, organised crime and terrorism.

  4. The UK economy benefits massively from being part of the world’s biggest single market. It’s not just about big corporations exporting good and more importantly services (8/10 British jobs) seamlessly, but also universities, the science sector, the tech sector, the green economy, the arts, farming and more.

    It’s also about the billions of pounds of foreign direct investment from companies setting up EU operations in the UK and the many jobs and opportunities that creates.

  5. Worker’s rights including paid holidays, pension rights, parental leave and anti-discrimination rules are enhanced by EU membership. The EU sets minimum standards below which no decent country should fall; the UK is free to set higher standards. When many on the Leave side talk about “cutting red tape”; remember they mean worker’s rights.

  6. The EU has led the world on tackling climate change and protecting the environment often with Britain at the forefront. At home this has meant cleaner beaches and greater protection of our beautiful countryside and native wildlife.



* If they were, as committed Pro-Europeans, they’d be voting REMAIN....

Tuesday, 21 June 2016

EU free movement is NOT unconditional!

Judging from media coverage of the referendum, many Brits would be excused for believing that EU free movement is absolutely unconditional and that the UK has no right to refuse entry to any EU national or prevent them living here long term. Hence the accusations of “uncontrolled” EU migration.

This is false, because the rules are quite clear that EU citizens can be refused entry to the UK on the (rather broad) grounds of public policy, public security or public health. Decisions have to be taken on a case-by-case basis entry can be refused if an individual represents a current and serious threat to the UK.

The Home Office recently confirmed that since 2010, 6,500 EU citizens were refused entry to the UK (see article:


Secondly, EU law is equally clear that an EU citizen can only stay in another EU country for longer than three months if:

  • The person can show they are working (employed or self-employed) or have sufficient resources to support themselves e.g. via a pension or other income/savings
  • The person has comprehensive sickness insurance to cover their healthcare needs e.g. valid European Health Insurance Card enabling the NHS to claim back the cost of treatment or private health insurance



A UCL study showed that from 2001-2011, EU citizens as a whole made a £5 billion net contribution to the UK economy:

Rapid Formations study found that EU citizens contribute 13.5% more to the UK than they receive in benefits or public services:

CONTRARY TO TABLOID MYTH, EU CITIZENS CAN’T COME TO THE UK AND IMMEDIATELY CLAIM BENEFITS, but must be genuinely resident in the UK and have contributed in order to pass what is called the “habitual residence test” which requires:

  • The person is currently working or self-employed and earning enough to pay national insurance contributions
  • The person is self-sufficient e.g. via a pension or savings, or a student
  • The person has been living in the UK for at least five years is therefore a permanent resident

Failing the habitual residence test means a person is refused all means-tested benefits such as job seekers allowance, tax credits, housing benefit etc. EU job seekers cannot claim means tested benefits for the first three months and are heavily restricted (it’s nearly impossible) to claim after three months, even if they have a verified job offer.

More information can be found here:

Following David Cameron’s renegotiations, in future EU citizens will have to wait four years before being able to claim in-work benefits such as housing benefit in the same way as Brits do:


Official government figures showed that in 2015, EU nationals made up 6% of the workforce, but only 2.2% of out of work benefit claims. British And of course some of those EU citizens claiming out of work benefits will have lived and paid taxes in the UK for many years, so it’s only fair that they can claim if they lose their job.

DWP data:

In terms of in-work benefits like child tax credits and housing benefit, EU workers make up around 7% of claims. See UK Parliament report:

Monday, 20 June 2016

Young people & Europe

Here is the unabridged version of my letter to the Evening Standard which was published last week:

Dear Evening Standard,

The 13 June letters about young people seem to think EU membership is only about opportunities to work, study and travel across Europe (which young people are very keen on) and completely ignore that being in the EU stimulates huge foreign direct investment in the UK, which creates jobs.

This investment comes mainly from companies in other EU countries, but Japanese and American companies also use the UK as a springboard to the world's biggest free trade area, the EU single market. Many of us know someone who works for one of those companies.

Outside the EU, such investment is unlikely unless single market access is guaranteed, but the promises Leave campaigns have made (no more EU rules, no free movement, no EU contribution) means being outside the single market. It is possible to trade with the EU without being in the single market, but it's very limited; a huge step back from what we have now. Leave campaigners need to come clean about what this will mean for our economy and stop pretending we can have our cake and eat it.

Young people are overwhelmingly voting IN because they want the opportunities the EU offers and they think it's sensible to collaborate closely with our European neighbours. They don't want to take the country back; they want to take it forward!

Yours sincerely,

Rebecca Taylor
Liberal Democrat IN Together campaign

Thursday, 16 June 2016

Cut through the noise & get unbiased background & facts on the EU referendum!

A lot of people, particularly undecided voters, complain that they struggle to find good quality unbiased information so they can weigh up the arguments for REMAIN and LEAVE and then make up their own mind. 

There are a number of reliable non-biased information sources which either present both sides of the debate and/or fact check the claims coming from the IN and OUT campaigns:

(1) Fullfact is an independent fact-checking charity which is examining claims from IN and OUT campaigns:

Worth noting that 38 degrees, the campaigning organisation, which has no position on the EU referendum, is advising its members to consult fullfact, see:

(2) BBC news EU referendum reality check:

Interestingly enough, the BBC EU referendum reality check conclusions have sometimes contradicted news reporting by the BBC (which isn't a great advert for BBC impartiality and accuracy....)

(3) Channel Four fact check on the EU:

(4) King’s College London website promoting high quality independent research on the UK’s relationship with the EU. Also includes some fact checking of claims from both sides: